The purchase of carbon offsets cannot contribute to SBTi near-term or long-term targets, but companies are expected to use carbon removals, including carbon credits, to offset any residual emissions that remain once emissions from a company’s entire value chain have been reduced to a level that aligns with SBTi criteria. For most businesses, these residual emissions are capped at 10% of total value chain emissions. This places impactful emphasis on companies to actively reduce their own Scope emissions.

The rigour and comprehensive scope of the SBTi are exactly what society needs to take meaningful steps toward accelerated decarbonisation. With thousands of companies already working with SBTi, this target-structured approach is set to become the gold standard protocol for companies looking to take ownership over their environmental impact and demonstrate climate action leadership.

What are Science-Based Targets?

In this context, science-based targets are greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction goals with clearly defined pathways that align with scientific consensus on how to limit global climate change to 1.5°C relative to pre-industrial levels.

Science-based targets involve establishing a baseline reference year and setting near-term and long-term targets in pursuit of net-zero emissions. The interim near-term target typically has a deadline of 5-10 years after plan submission to SBTi and requires steady year-over-year emissions reductions that keep the company on track to meet their long-term target. The long-term target reflects an overall percentage reduction of GHG emissions across a company’s value chain that must be met by 2050. 

How to Set a Science-Based Target

The SBTi outlines a five-step process for companies to set their own targets:

1. Commit: this involves a letter submission that declares the company’s commitment to setting a science-based target. This submission activates a two-year countdown to complete steps two through four.
2. Develop: the company needs to establish a baseline year reflective of normal operating conditions and then set near- and long-term targets that align with SBTi criteria for mitigating climate change.
3. Submit: the company must present their target to the SBTi for official validation.
4. Communicate: once approved, the company has to inform stakeholders of its science-based target through an official announcement.
5. Disclose: the company compiles annual reports that reveal its emissions and track progress toward meeting targets.

Who is Setting Science-Based Targets

The number of companies associated with SBTi continues to rise, with nearly 3,000 companies having commitments and 1,374 having approved targets. Household names like Amazon and Facebook are working with SBTi, as well as some of Australia’s largest companies such as Australian Postal Corporation, Bank Australia, and Intrepid Travel. Companies worldwide are noticing the impact of this movement, encouraging more and more to adopt SBTi strategies to tackle climate change and embrace leadership in sustainability.

Why are Science-Based Targets Important?

As the connection between fossil fuel use and climate change becomes clearer, there is a growing incentive to decarbonise as a benefit to the planet, people, and the economy. Joining SBTi enables companies to become part of this movement that will empower society and build a more resilient economy.

The World Needs to Decarbonise

First and foremost, the world must decarbonise. Continued use of fossil fuels is unsustainable and is linked to devastating global shifts – like climate change, sea-level rise, and ocean acidification – that threaten biodiversity, human wellbeing, and financial security.

A Strong Business Strategy

As global consensus unites on the need for decarbonisation, setting meaningful GHG emissions targets is becoming a best practice for companies across industries. Gone are the days when a company could declare a carbon reduction commitment without validating claims. Consumers and investors alike recognize that action is required, and they will gravitate toward companies that are taking action-driven steps toward decarbonisation. Therefore, setting science-based targets is also a strong way to stay relevant to increasingly climate-conscious consumers and investors. Soon, companies without well-established climate action plans will be at a disadvantage, as investors want to ensure their capital is in vehicles that are well-equipped to navigate the changing energy and business landscape.

It Will Strengthen Resilience

To support and accelerate decarbonisation efforts, governmental policy will have to play an impactful role. This will lead to regulatory bodies and reporting frameworks to increase prioritisation of climate action. Twenty-seven countries, including Singapore and New Zealand, have already embraced a carbon tax. More countries are likely to follow similar strategies that align net-zero initiatives with the corporate agenda. By setting science-based targets, a company is preparing for the inevitable shifts in carbon policy.

Additionally, pathways to reaching science-based targets involve strategies that will help companies save money and gain energy independence. The first steps to decarbonisation often involve improving energy efficiency, which results in lower fuel demands and therefore fewer operational expenses. Beyond energy efficiency, pathways will consider electrification of processes to transition away from fossil fuels and leverage an electric grid with an increasing abundance of clean power generation from renewable energy sources. Taking advantage of the local energy grid reduces a company’s susceptibility to fluctuating fossil fuel prices, which will likely increase in the coming years as the world continues its energy transition and governments implement more policies that penalise carbon intensity. Therefore, transitioning to clean, renewable energy sources will provide more predictable energy costs and long-term energy cost savings.

Conclusion

The comprehensive SBTi approach provides guidance and support for companies serious about doing their part to tackle climate change. With targets designed to limit global warming to 1.5°C, companies and entire sectors will have to take transformational action. Those that do not acknowledge science-based targets or embrace the growing decarbonisation movement will be left behind as consumers and investors transition to climate-friendly options.

To help companies stay competitive and improve their corporate responsibility strategy, Northmore Gordon assists with the design, implementation, and reporting of SBTi commitments. We help companies experience profitable decarbonisation that aligns with best scientific practices and their corporate objectives.

SBTi and Northmore Gordon are building momentum. Despite not currently being on pace to uphold the 1.5°C climate change limit set in the Paris Climate Agreement, we are much closer now than we were ten years ago. Through dedication and cooperation, companies and industry can align with SBTi and cement their legacy as being part of the turning point that led society towards a cleaner, brighter future.

The post Why Science-Based Targets Are the Gold Standard for GHG Emissions Strategy appeared first on Northmore Gordon.

There is broad recognition, that in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change, global temperatures need to stay below 1.5°C.  In order to have a 50% chance of not exceeding 1.5°C, global emissions need to halve by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.  

Whilst the science is clear, what isn’t clear is what it actually means to set a net-zero target. 

“The Net-Zero Standard gives companies a clear blueprint on how to bring their net-zero plans in line with the science, which is non-negotiable in this decisive decade for climate action. Because we are running out of time.” 

Johan Rockstrom, Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and Professor in Earth System Science at the University of Potsdam

The IPCC defines net-zero emissions as being when “anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere are balanced by anthropogenic removals over a specified period”, however, this is net-zero emissions as defined from a global level, and there is a lack of consistency about what it means on an individual organisation level.  

It is seen that net-zero emissions targets being adopted by businesses don’t align on the timeframe for reaching net-zero, the inclusion of other greenhouse emissions than CO2e, and the extent of the emissions boundary. A critical piece of science-based target setting is halving emissions by 2030. 

But wait, why is it important to immediately and rapidly reduce emissions now or within next 10 years?  

We are given a carbon budget to limit temperature warming and the longer we wait to act, the wider the temperature range. The IPCC AR6 Report determined that we have a total carbon budget of 500 Gtonnes of CO2 to give the world a 50% chance of keeping temperatures below 1.5 degrees C – we need urgent action now to reduce emissions and must reach net-zero carbon emissions no later than 2050. 

On 28 October, the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) launched the world’s first-ever corporate framework for net-zero target setting. This standard provides guidance, criteria, and recommendations companies need to set science-based net-zero targets consistent with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C. 

Here are the four key elements of the Net Zero Standard Framework: 

• To set near-term science-based targets: 5-10 year emission reduction targets in line with 1.5°C pathways 
• To set long-term science-based targets: Target to reduce emissions to a residual level in line with 1.5°C scenarios by no later than 2050 
• Beyond value chain mitigation: In the transition to net-zero, companies should take action to mitigate emissions beyond their value chains. For example, purchasing high-quality, jurisdictional REDD+ credits or investing in direct air capture (DAC) and geologic storage 
• Neutralization of residual emissions: GHGs released into the atmosphere when the company has achieved their long-term SBT must be counterbalanced through the permanent removal and storage of carbon from the atmosphere 

This is exciting news as it’s the first time the SBTi has clarified the acceptable level of genuine decarbonisation and carbon offsets permitted within a science-based net-zero target. The SBTi is also committing to working closely to set standards for monitoring, reporting and verification, with more expected policies around what and how to report. 

The difficulty for many companies is the strategic process behind emissions reduction, both in planning and implementation. At Northmore Gordon, we will get you started on the right foot and can provide ongoing support to make sure that you reach your target goals. We’re all in this together, you can feel confident that support is available to assist you on your Net-Zero journey. 

The post SBTi Launches World-First Net-Zero Corporate Standard appeared first on Northmore Gordon.